Moderator: Moderator Pack
gwp4me2 wrote:My male is from KJ's kennel and carries that name. I owe it to him to only allow Max to be bred to quality females. Hips, thyroid, bite, tested or trialed successfully under good judges. I tell people he is only paired with females that i would want a puppy from.
GPBLITZ wrote:IMO I owe the breeder nothing.
GPBLITZ wrote: I have on problem breeding to a out and out wild bird dog that stack up to requirements. Those dogs carry the genetics that I like.
gwp4me2 wrote:GPBLITZ wrote:IMO I owe the breeder nothing.
So when you sell puppies to people you don't care at all what they do with them?
GPBLITZ wrote:IMO I owe the breeder nothing. I owe it to the breed to be selective on females and males I choose.
gwp4me2 wrote: KJ takes good care of me and I'm not going to put his kennel name a a litter of marginal or worse puppies
gwp4me2 wrote: More and more quality breeders are putting limited registrations on puppies until the owner can show the dog to be good breeding stock.
gwp4me2 wrote: The tested and trial dogs have at least been looked at by somebody who has seen a lot of dogs. It also shows at least some level of investment of effort by the owner.
GPBLITZ wrote:We see good dog and marginal dogs in every venue. Titles can be desiving . How many MH's have run 20 plus time to earn the title. How many UT dogs have run 8, 10 times to pull down a UT-1 ? IMO you have dip S$%t owner trainer or a dip sh^ t dog. At times I've seen a handler come test carrying a BB gun or a carved wooden gun . What that tell you. For me hunting first, test dog second. If a dog can not handle wild birds consistantly the dogs not worth the titles they earn playing games... JMO
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests