Changes to federal law may affect breeders

Local, state, national, and international public policies as they relate to hunting, animals, dogs, and the outdoors. Act now to protect our rights and interests!

Moderator: Moderator Pack

Changes to federal law may affect breeders

Postby spinster » Tue May 22, 2012 1:15 pm

USDA/APHIS NOW ACCEPTING COMMENTS ON FEDERAL RULE PROPOSAL
[Thursday, May 17, 2012]

Yesterday, a proposed change to how the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA)/Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) may administer federal Animal Welfare Act (AWA) regulations affecting “Retail Pet Stores and Licensing Exemptions” was published to the Federal Register. Comments on the proposal are now being accepted by APHIS.

The American Kennel Club continues to believe that the proposed changes have the potential to significantly impact AKC breeders, and encourages all interested parties to review the proposed rule and offer comment.

Click here to view the proposed rule.

Click here to view a USDA Fact Sheet about the proposed rule.

Background: The AWA exempts from federal licensing and regulations “retail pet stores”, which are defined as anyone selling puppies directly to a final customer for use as pets. It is this exemption that enables most small or hobby breeders to currently avoid being licensed and regulated by the USDA.

The new proposed rule rescinds the exempt “retail pet store” status of anyone selling pets at retail to buyers who do not physically enter the breeder’s facilities in order to personally observe the animals available for sale prior to purchase and/or to take custody of the animals after purchase.The primary purpose of this rule is to regulate breeders who sell puppies online. The changes in the rule mean that breeders or others who sell puppies sight unseen, by any means, would now be regulated under USDA regulations.

The proposed rule also increases from three to four the number of a breeding females that a person may maintain on his or her premises and be exempt from the licensing and inspection requirements in the AWA, regardless of how the offspring are sold.

The AKC has a number of concerns, including:

In many cases, geographic distance makes it difficult for a purchaser to personally visit or pick up the puppy at the breeder’s kennel. Such scenarios are particularly common for breeders and fanciers of rare breeds and others who may be purchasing a second pet from the same breeder or already have an established relationship with a breeder. Requiring such individuals to comply with regulations designed for large commercial may not be appropriate.
The term “breeding female” is not defined. It is unclear at what age a female dog might be considered a “breeding female”.
The AKC believes, based on its own experience in kennel inspections and breeding operations that the Regulatory Impact Analysis provided in the proposed rule vastly underestimates both the number the of individuals who will be impacted and the expense to occasional breeders to establish commercial-level facilities.

Changes to regulations differ significantly from legislation. Unlike legislation, where entire new laws can easily be developed, the proposed rule (regulations) may only address a narrow scope of how an existing law—the AWA—may be administered by the government. This means that the options for impacting regulatory outcomes are very limited compared to options for impacting legislation. The primary recourse for impacted parties for regulatory change is to provide specific expertise and comment on the proposed rule – which may or may not be accepted by the executive authority interpreting the law.
Read more and get link: http://www.akc.org/news/index.cfm?article_id=4656
spinster
Master Poster
Master Poster
 
Posts: 397
Joined: Sat Feb 04, 2006 2:29 pm

Re: Changes to federal law may affect breeders

Postby JIM K » Tue May 22, 2012 5:23 pm

HSUS is doing this too.they went after puppy mills which was good BUT their real agenda is to stop all animal breeding for sale etc.this meansNO BREEDING OF HUNTING DOGS.

ricky santorium was in their pocket and is reason he did not run for president AFTER he returned HOME to pa.
we defeated him by 18% last time and he knew we would do it again.
romney is another one to watch,so is newt. all 3 support groups like this. :evil:
JIM K
Master Poster
Master Poster
 
Posts: 410
Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2012 12:26 am
Location: pa


Return to Legislation and Laws

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest